Tuesday, December 29, 2015

Reader Submission: Random Shitty Incidents Around Toronto

Here's a submission from someone describing his various experiences in Toronto:

1. Divorce is ultra popular so much so that it’s now a fad and if you are not divorced, you are a freak. I have ended a countless number of girls with no father and each single one of their mothers blamed the failed marriage on the man. Not a single one took a shred of responsibility – it was all the man’s fault and that’s all they ever talked about. One was prominent enough to talk about how men have emotions too and she used those stories to make men look weak and pathetic as if that justified her misery of being alone and unwanted. She projected these idiotic ideas onto her daughter and thankfully the daughter was of rational mind, but I had to put up with the mother

2. There are incidents when being in places and being male is just shitty luck. Toronto women will openly attack men verbally because they think it’s socially acceptable and funny. They will rudely interject your private conversations because they are judging how you communicate with your girlfriend or female friend. They are listening like Orwell’s 1984. In one case my girlfriend made a joke about that I don’t clean and a random stranger in the elevator just began judging me and rudely said “yeah well why would he?” suggesting that because I am man I am for some reason a prick that doesn’t clean. WTF? My girlfriend felt so bad for saying that, that she felt she needed to say something to make me look good again so she said I make the best cocktails. What should have happened is I should have told the strange woman to mind her own fucking business and that it’s incredibly rude to judge someone like that especially given she doesn’t know any context and I am a total stranger. A lesson for the future.

3. Another incident is when my sister and I were at a pharmacy standing in line. A man was talking loudly on his phone and this miserable hag just injects herself into our conversation and starts talking shit about a total stranger. She said “god that man is obnoxious and he’s so aggressive just yelling like that”. My sister and I laughed it off because we are POLITE unlike her and then a female pharmacist chimed in with attitude talking down about the guy saying he is a dick that does it all the time. WOW, WHAT THE FUCK? Being a guy and talking loudly on the phone credits with excess female ridicule and critique. Fan-fucking-tastic. What we should have said was “be an adult and go politely ask him to speak quieter.” Lesson for the future.

4. Another incident happened when I entered Starbucks and a total strange woman gave me a vile bitch face. I gave an aggressive look back and she looked away. Then I felt her glare so I looked back at her and she covered her face and to her friends, LOUDLY, said “what the hell, does he need help of something”. Oh great, now I’m a person with special needs because I stared back at a total bitch. Toronto women take 0 responsibility for their actions. Absolutely none – everything is the man’s fault.

5. Nightclubs – man don’t get me started here. I stared working at nightclubs at 14 years old hanging coats. I worked in nightclubs until I was 20 years old so I have seen it all inside of nightclubs. I have both perspectives : as a passive bystander when I worked and as an active participator when I went to party. NIGHTCLUBS ARE A CONVERGENCE OF SELF RIGHTEOUS BITCHES THAT BUILD THEIR EGOS BY TURNING GUYS DOWN. I came up to a girl acting like a human being and she gave me this massive bitch face like there was a rotting corpse somewhere, took her friend by her hand and walked away. Wow…. Fuck me for talking to a fellow human right?! Fucking treated me like shit and I didn’t deserve it. What a fucking cunt. Then about a few hours later she did that to about oooo… the whole nightclub and finally a guy, about my age took her by the hand, gave her the two biggest middle fingers and shoved them right in her face. I shook the guy’s fucking hand. Thank god! Finally a Toronto man that could stand up for himself. The cunt gave him the same massive bitch face, pulled her friend by the hand and walked away. That’s what these cunts do, they act shitty to men because they fucking feel superior from it. At this same club there was these two sluts wearing nothing but skin sitting on the couch and I shit you not, there was a line up of desperate fucking men, beaten down by society, thinking they are worthless… just fucking waiting to talk to these two cunts and they were turning down men systematically. I felt so sorry for these men… like dam it…. I can’t believe men are thinking so low of themselves these days, and women are thinking so highly of themselves. It’s fucking depressing.

6. I had guy friends that were with total bitches. These guys were about an average looking 7 and these cunts they were with… maybe a 4 max a 5. And these bitches acted so superior and told these guys what to do and what to think! They fucking ignored their friends like me like I am invisible, like I’m not a human being. And these guys stuck with them!? Why? So fucking sad. I wish they could learn self worth and self respect… but they were born in Toronto with mothers that taught them this way and they have no choice. They know nothing else. It depresses me.

7. Lesbianism is this new attention whoring fad and a convenient way to let men down. At least a way to let down men that don’t fit Toronto women’s idea of perfection… Which is easily manipulable, rich, and handsome…… oh and takes all her shit and never complains… you know…like a dog. So many girls claim to be lesbians and take narcissistic selfies for Instagram kissing their bitch friends and yet not a single one has interest or has ever (or will ever) lick a vagina. So let’s not pretend, idiotic women of Toronto, that you are even 1% lesbian. I know a tonnnnnne of idiots with this complex.

8. In general, on the street, or in the store women are allergic to eye contact. Good god, good luck trying to get one to look at you. And then you develop the same traits and there are entitled women that will get mad at you for not looking at them! Lol. So now you’re stuck, you can’t look at women because soon that will be illegal and if you don’t look at them they get mad. How fucking lovely. Toronto is a sad state and I don’t wish it upon anyone that respects themselves and wants good things for themselves. I hate being here and I can’t wait to get out.


Here’s my background for retrospect:

- Born in Eastern Europe

- Moved to Canada when I was 7, I am 26 now

- Have lived in Florida for 4 months and drove thru the states 3 times

- Have lived for months at a time in Europe and been to places like Warsaw, Bulgaria, Amsterdam, Romania, and the women there are real women with no pretension and with healthy sexualities

- You can call me well-traveled compared to an average person and definitely well-seasoned. I’ve been around, I’ve seen some shit. Toronto is the worst shithole to be in. I think it’s a modern, capitalist city thing. I think it’s a function of this westernization fad seen all over the world and of course the first cities/countries to grab onto this shit are the big capitalized ones like London, Peru, Moscow (pussy riot), New York, and of course the worst and most sexist one of them all – Toronto.

Thursday, December 3, 2015

Marriage, Inc.

A while ago I wrote about Relationship, Inc. I figure now is a good time to write about the more evil complement of this known as Marriage, Inc.

There is a real trend out there in the land of the married. It's a sinister trend as many have already noted, so the purpose of this post is not to repeat what is mostly already known, but instead to shed light on the institution of marriage in a way that I haven't been able to articulate until now. I will draw close parallels between marriage and a cutthroat business, as you shall see.

If you've ever been around women, either through casual acquaintance or via relationships, you'll notice that they tend to want to get married, if not right away, then eventually. From my perspective this comes across as unnecessary because marriage does not guarantee that people will stay together. So it's not an insurance policy in terms of holding on to love or enhancing love. What it is much more likely to be is an insurance policy for financial and economic security, by way of guaranteed (spousal) support, just like people will seek out government jobs, not because they like those jobs, but because of the perks, like having a good pension. So the goal of the marriage-minded female is primarily, and generally speaking, life security, made possible by the legal stipulations and entitlements that are enforced by the state.

The deception is that women will insinuate that getting married is the ultimate expression of commitment and love, and will not admit that their desire is based upon security reasons, as mentioned. This deception can take a further twist when it is implied that unless you are willing to risk your assets and put part of your assets on the line for her then you are not truly in love. So in other words you must be willing to lose something (if you break up), especially if those things that you lose go to her. If you can walk away with your money and assets intact that is a no-deal since it means you're not really in love. And it doesn't matter that during the relationship you might have done a lot of things for her. True love is (according to her definition) signing up to support her even if you are gone. And anything less than that, such as being able to walk away without having to give her anything, is unacceptable.

The irony here is that any argument that suggests that women should be entitled to a man's money and assets must hinge on traditional gender roles where a man works and a woman stays home (and isn't supposed to work) and must therefore naturally depend on the man for support. But relying on this argument negates the modern day reality that most women can and do work, and are encouraged to do so. If women are to be truly emancipated then they can't invoke such double standards when it suits them.

Women who are hell-bent on achieving security in life are the ones you need to watch out for the most. They will say and do whatever they need to in order to ball and chain a man into servitude of their primal needs. Sexually speaking these women are total mercenaries, which can be at odds with their natural libido. For these women it is in their economic best interest to not enjoy sex very much, for this allows them to more easily invoke supply-side restrictions on sex for economic/resource gain. These women are always marriage minded because it creates the legal framework that helps them achieve their goal of 100% security in life. Don't be the poor sucker that falls for their charms. If you must pay for sex do it on a per-use basis via prostitutes which eliminates all the potential trappings.

I've always had a rule, and that is to always start off on a casual level with women, and if it progresses to being more, so be it. But this way I weed out most of the security-seekers who seek to ball and chain a man via the proxy of relationships and marriage. So far this strategy has worked well. However, if you're the type of guy who sings like a canary when a woman asks "what do you do?" then you are swimming in shark-infested waters, and you better watch out! Even the women who seem the nicest can likely be not so nice after all once the ring goes on their finger.

These nice women will start off nice but as they climb the ladder of certainty, starting from dating at the beginning, to engagement, to finally marriage, they will increasingly become less nice, and more domineering. Once the deal (marriage) is finalized they will revert to their true nasty colors.

In achieving marriage, women push you away from independence (from them) and toward enslavement (for them). And the fact that marriage is still so encouraged must hinge on the belief that not doing this means you just don't love her or care about commitment.

Women (not all) will treat marriage as a cutthroat business, with performance requirements, incentives (sex), and eliminating competitors (friends, family of husband, etc.) so that all the time and resources and affections of her husband belong to her. They run marriage like a cutthroat business basically. These women are ALL business when it comes to their marriage. And it is even worse than working for a cutthroat company, since even these companies give you weekends and evenings off (in addition to paying you), and they still expect you to have a life outside of work. However, in Marriage, Inc. you are working 7 days a week, for her.

To ensure that their husband's resources are all funneled into Marriage, Inc, the marriage CEOs (the women) will minimize or eliminate their husband's alliances (friends, family, etc.) and will at the same time increase and nurture their own network of family and friends and sources of support. In business terms you can think of this as eliminating the competition while expanding your business network.

The marriage CEO will also penny pinch as much as she can and will ruthlessly seek savings where ever she can. And she will do this while also spending a fair bit on luxury items that she personally enjoys. She is not too different from CEOs we hear about in the media which ship jobs overseas and cut employee benefits while enjoying inflated salaries. In their twisted minds, what's good for me is good for the company. And in women's minds, what's good for me is good for the marriage. It's the same twisted rationalization.

Even worse, in Marriage, Inc. you have to leave some of your earning potential behind if you leave. Part of your future earnings, upon leaving (separation or divorce), will be garnished by Marriage, Inc. Compare this to a regular company that you work for, in which once you leave you get to take all of your earning potential with you. Now, I'm not opposed to child support, and that's not what I'm talking about here. I'm talking about financial support for the Marriage CEOs (the women) who are fully capable of making their own money.

Like I have said, be very cautious with women who are adamant about wanting security in life. They will eat everything they can to feather their nest, and Marriage, Inc. is the perfect institution for these women. These women are very cold and calculating and like a ruthless corporation view everything in terms of profit. In addition to "marriage CEO" another good name for these women is Calculatress because they're always calculating.

If you're not careful these women will bleed your ass dry, along with everything else that is within their web of influence. According to them everything must go into the marriage machine, which serves her own interests and that of her children, all courtesy of you, the workhorse (i.e. husband). This is natural selection at work, since the ancestral women who did this were best at ensuring the survival of future generations. However, given that we are supposed to live in a civil society now that doesn't cater to barbaric behaviour, there must be "strict moral sanctions" to curtail this tendency in women, because all natural instincts, in the absence of checks and balances, will ultimately be destructive. Modern society in a way has removed some of these natural checks and balances which were there when survival was more difficult.

I'm not saying women will necessarily go into a marriage thinking that they'll do all this (although some do I'm sure). But when marriage happens it's like a switch goes off in their heads and all of a sudden everything becomes crystal clear in terms of what they have to do to run the marriage like a business. They suddenly become the master CEO of Marriage, Inc., micro-managing everything they can. And with the laws surrounding marriage being what they are in favor of women, it is far too tempting for women not to indulge this nasty instinct they have. Only a truly strong and honest woman can overcome this and keep a sense of fair play.

Ultimately, Marriage, Inc. wouldn't be possible without the white knight instinct of men (also based on natural selection). A man who wishes to indulge his white knight instincts will pander to all the wishes of the marriage CEO because he wants to be a good husband (i.e. worker). That said, you will never know a man's true character until he gets the pussy, and then see how he behaves. Scoundrel men are the first to indulge their baser instincts (like greed, selfishness) which includes their white knight instinct where women are concerned.

Bottom line, resist your white knight instinct. Make a serious effort to view things as an outside observer would, keeping concepts of fairness in mind. You can have women in your life but my recommendation is don't marry. At most live together but be aware of what the laws say regarding common law living. Get legal advice if necessary. Don't get suckered.